|
Dedication |
6 |
|
|
Preface |
8 |
|
|
Acknowledgments |
10 |
|
|
Contents |
12 |
|
|
Contributors |
14 |
|
|
Chapter 1Institutional Trust: An Introduction |
15 |
|
|
Institutional Trust: An Introduction |
15 |
|
|
Trusting an Institution |
15 |
|
|
Disciplinary and Semantic Considerations |
19 |
|
|
Overview of the Book |
21 |
|
|
References |
23 |
|
|
Chapter 2Would Trust by Any Other Name Smell as Sweet? Reflections on the Meanings and Uses of Trust Across Disciplines and Context |
26 |
|
|
Introduction |
26 |
|
|
Definitions of Trust |
26 |
|
|
Differentiating Antecedents and Trust |
28 |
|
|
Distrust |
29 |
|
|
Trust by Other Names |
29 |
|
|
Cooperation |
30 |
|
|
Predictability |
30 |
|
|
Confidence |
30 |
|
|
Legitimacy |
30 |
|
|
Swift Trust |
32 |
|
|
Faith |
32 |
|
|
Other Implications of Our Conceptualization of Trust |
32 |
|
|
Trust Is Not Reciprocal |
32 |
|
|
Trust Is Domain Specific |
33 |
|
|
Different Weighting of Trustworthiness Factors |
33 |
|
|
Individual Differences |
34 |
|
|
Cross-Cultural Differences |
34 |
|
|
Difference in Role and Perspective |
34 |
|
|
Understanding Trust Repair |
34 |
|
|
Institutional Trust |
35 |
|
|
Trust Is Giving Up Control |
35 |
|
|
Trust Across Disciplines |
36 |
|
|
Accounting and Financial Institutions |
36 |
|
|
Operations Research |
37 |
|
|
Trust, Risk, and Control Systems |
38 |
|
|
Online Marketing and Retailing |
39 |
|
|
Definitions of Online-Trust |
39 |
|
|
Trust and Risk in Online Retailing |
41 |
|
|
Politics and Government |
43 |
|
|
Discussion and Conclusions |
44 |
|
|
References |
45 |
|
|
Chapter 3Trust as a Leap of Hope for Transaction Value: A Two-Way Street Above and Beyond Trust Propensity and Expected Trustworthiness |
49 |
|
|
The Underlying Roots of the Core Problems in Trust Research |
50 |
|
|
The Emerging Solutions to the Core Problems in Trust Research |
54 |
|
|
Future Agenda for Trust Research |
58 |
|
|
References |
63 |
|
|
Chapter 4Creating Legitimacy: The Interrelated Roles of Justice and Trust |
66 |
|
|
Introduction: Forms of Glue |
66 |
|
|
Conceptualizing Legitimacy |
69 |
|
|
Justice and Legitimacy Models |
71 |
|
|
Conceptualizing Justice |
71 |
|
|
Identity- and Resource-Based Models of Legitimacy |
72 |
|
|
Procedural Justice Identity-Based Model |
72 |
|
|
Distributive Justice Resource-Based Model |
74 |
|
|
Bringing in Trust Considerations |
77 |
|
|
Adopting a Working Definition of Trust |
77 |
|
|
Development of Trust in Authority/Subordinate Relationships |
78 |
|
|
Contextual Factors Affecting the Role of Trust and Justice in the Development of Legitimacy |
80 |
|
|
Power Inequality and Leadership Dynamics |
80 |
|
|
Intergroup Dynamics |
82 |
|
|
Beyond the Perceiver: Impact of the Social Context |
84 |
|
|
Conclusion: Trust Connections and Directions |
86 |
|
|
References |
88 |
|
|
Chapter 5Legitimacy Is for Losers: The Interconnections of Institutional Legitimacy, Performance Evaluations, and the Symbols of Judicial Authority |
92 |
|
|
The Specific Support – Diffuse Support Linkage |
94 |
|
|
Reconsidering the Bartels and Johnston Data |
99 |
|
|
Gibson and Nelson on the Legitimacy of Losers |
103 |
|
|
Reconsidering the Obamacare Ruling |
104 |
|
|
Adding Winners and Losers to the Analysis |
107 |
|
|
Multivariate Analysis |
114 |
|
|
The Role of Symbols in Mitigating the Impact of Policy Disappointment |
117 |
|
|
Concluding Thoughts |
123 |
|
|
References |
124 |
|
|
Cases |
127 |
|
|
Chapter 6Who Trusts the Trial Courts, To What Extent, and Why? |
128 |
|
|
The Case for Trial Court Exceptionalism |
129 |
|
|
Trial Courts Are Locally Organized |
129 |
|
|
The Mass Media and the Public Image of Trial Courts |
131 |
|
|
Direct Trial Court Experience |
135 |
|
|
At the Confluence of Localism, Media-Imagery, and Direct Experience |
137 |
|
|
Data and Dependent Variables |
138 |
|
|
The Three Questions |
140 |
|
|
Who Trusts the Courts and To What Extent? |
140 |
|
|
Why Do People Trust (or Not Trust) Trial Courts? |
142 |
|
|
Digging Deeper into the Meaning of Experience |
145 |
|
|
Being a Juror |
146 |
|
|
Being a Resident in an Area Served by a Community Court |
147 |
|
|
Being an Offender in a Problem-Solving Court |
148 |
|
|
Insights from the Study of Trust in the Police |
149 |
|
|
Conclusion: The Devil Is in the Details |
150 |
|
|
References |
152 |
|
|
Chapter 7On the Dual Motivational Force of Legitimate Authority |
156 |
|
|
Introduction |
156 |
|
|
Psychological Jurisprudence and the Duty to Obey |
158 |
|
|
A Philosophical Question |
158 |
|
|
An Empirical Question |
158 |
|
|
Lessons for Policy |
159 |
|
|
Expanding the Definition and Motivating Power of Legitimacy |
160 |
|
|
Study Objectives |
162 |
|
|
A Study of People’s Willingness to Comply with Traffic Laws |
165 |
|
|
Data |
165 |
|
|
Measures |
166 |
|
|
Results |
167 |
|
|
Conclusions |
169 |
|
|
Limitations of the Research |
172 |
|
|
Final Thoughts on Legal Socialization |
173 |
|
|
References |
174 |
|
|
Chapter 8Political Trust in Polarized Times |
178 |
|
|
Understanding Political Trust |
180 |
|
|
Polarization and Its Impact on Political Trust |
184 |
|
|
Consequences of Political Trust in an Era of Polarization |
188 |
|
|
Policy Outcomes |
189 |
|
|
Support for Democratic Processes |
191 |
|
|
Conclusion |
194 |
|
|
Appendix |
196 |
|
|
American National Election Studies Surveys |
196 |
|
|
Vilification Survey |
197 |
|
|
References |
198 |
|
|
Chapter 9The Epistemic Contract: Fostering an Appropriate Level of Public Trust in Experts |
202 |
|
|
Do Citizens Trust Experts? |
204 |
|
|
What Do Citizens Want from Experts? |
207 |
|
|
Accuracy, Confidence, and Calibration |
209 |
|
|
Confidence and Calibration as Persuasive Cues |
213 |
|
|
Biased Assimilation, Naïve Realism, and Attitude Attribution |
216 |
|
|
A Normative Perspective: The Epistemic Contract |
218 |
|
|
Facilitating an Appropriate Level of Trust in Experts |
219 |
|
|
Conclusion |
221 |
|
|
References |
222 |
|
|
Index |
226 |
|