|
Preface |
6 |
|
|
CLABIO 2015 Committees |
7 |
|
|
CLABIO 2015 CONFERENCE TOPICS |
9 |
|
|
Speakers |
10 |
|
|
Sponsors |
11 |
|
|
Table of Contents |
12 |
|
|
High Precision System for Bioimpedance Measurement |
14 |
|
|
I. INTRODUCTION |
14 |
|
|
II. HARDWARE |
14 |
|
|
III. FAST ALGORITHM FOR BIO-IMPEDANCE MEASUREMENT |
15 |
|
|
IV. EXPERIMENT RESULTS |
16 |
|
|
V. CONCLUSION |
17 |
|
|
Effects of Head Model Inaccuracies on Regional Scalp and Skull ConductivityEstimation Using Real EIT Measurements |
18 |
|
|
I. INTRODUCTION |
18 |
|
|
II. METHODS |
19 |
|
|
III. RESULTS |
20 |
|
|
IV. DISCUSSION |
20 |
|
|
V. CONCLUSIONS |
21 |
|
|
Electrolytic Extracellular Phantom to Study the Low-Frequency Conductivityof Cervical Neoplasia |
22 |
|
|
I. INTRODUCTION |
22 |
|
|
II. MATERIALS AND METHODS |
22 |
|
|
III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
23 |
|
|
IV. CONCLUSIONS |
23 |
|
|
Bone Electrical Impedance and Tomographic Reconstructionof Fracture Detection: A Review |
25 |
|
|
I. INTRODUCTION |
25 |
|
|
II. LONG BONE FRACTURE |
25 |
|
|
III. THE ABERBEEN IMPEDANCE IMAGING SYSTEM |
26 |
|
|
IV. REVIEW OF EIT APPLIED TO BONE |
27 |
|
|
V. ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS 2 DECADES LATER |
27 |
|
|
VI. POSSIBLE APPLICATION AND IMPROVEMENTS |
28 |
|
|
VII. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS |
28 |
|
|
Audio Codec and Digital Signal Processor for an ElectricalImpedance Tomography System |
29 |
|
|
I. INTRODUCTION |
29 |
|
|
II. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION |
30 |
|
|
III. RESULTS |
31 |
|
|
IV. CONCLUSION |
31 |
|
|
Segmental Electrical Bioimpedance Measurementswith a Single Lead (Electrode) Displacement |
33 |
|
|
I. INTRODUCTION |
33 |
|
|
II. MATERIALS AND METHODS |
34 |
|
|
III. RESULTS |
35 |
|
|
IV. DICUSSION |
35 |
|
|
V. CONCLUSION |
36 |
|
|
An Alternative Electrical Impedance Myography Technique for Assessmentof Local Muscular Fatigue |
37 |
|
|
I. INTRODUCTION |
37 |
|
|
II. METHODS |
37 |
|
|
III. RESULTS |
39 |
|
|
IV. DISCUSSION |
40 |
|
|
V. CONCLUSION |
40 |
|
|
In Vitro Luminal Measurements of Colon Electrical Impedance in Rabbits |
41 |
|
|
I. INTRODUCTION |
41 |
|
|
II - MATERIAL AND METHODS |
42 |
|
|
III - RESULTS |
42 |
|
|
IV. DISCUSSION |
42 |
|
|
V - CONCLUSIONS |
43 |
|
|
Assessment of Systolic Heart Function byWavelet Analysisof the Impedance Cardiogram |
45 |
|
|
I. INTRODUCTION |
45 |
|
|
II. MEASUREMENTS AND ITS PROCESSINGALGORITHM |
46 |
|
|
III. RESULTS |
47 |
|
|
IV. CONCLUSIONS |
48 |
|
|
Impedance-Based Monitoring for Tissue Engineering Applications |
49 |
|
|
I. INTRODUCTION |
49 |
|
|
II. MONITORING TISSUE ENGINEERING PROCESSES |
50 |
|
|
III. CONCLUSIONS |
51 |
|
|
Total Body Water (TBW) for Body Composition Assessmentin Young Adult Females from Colombia |
53 |
|
|
I. INTRODUCTION |
53 |
|
|
II. MATERIALS AND METHODS |
53 |
|
|
III. RESULTS |
54 |
|
|
IV. DISCUSSION |
55 |
|
|
V. CONCLUSIONS |
56 |
|
|
Electrical Properties of Normal Cervical Human Cells in Suspension:The Relation between Normal Tissue and Electrical Impedance Spectrum |
57 |
|
|
I. INTRODUCTION |
57 |
|
|
II. MATERIALS AND METHODS |
57 |
|
|
III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
58 |
|
|
IV. CONCLUSIONS |
59 |
|
|
Analog Front-End for the Integrated Circuit AD5933Used in Electrical Bioimpedance Measurements |
61 |
|
|
I. INTRODUCTION |
61 |
|
|
II. METHODOLOGY |
61 |
|
|
III. RESULTS |
62 |
|
|
IV. DISCUSSIONS |
63 |
|
|
Impedance Analysis for Medical and Electrochemical ApplicationsUsing a Low Cost Instrumentation |
65 |
|
|
I. INTRODUCTION |
65 |
|
|
II. MODELLING |
65 |
|
|
III. INSTRUMENTATION STRUCTURE |
66 |
|
|
IV. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS |
67 |
|
|
Low-Cost Body Impedance Analyzer for Healthcare Applications |
69 |
|
|
I. INTRODUCTION |
69 |
|
|
II. METHODOLOGY |
70 |
|
|
III. RESULTS |
71 |
|
|
IV. DISCUSSIONS |
72 |
|
|
V. CONCLUSION |
72 |
|
|
Development of Portable Device to Measure Respiratory ActivityBased on Impedance Pneumography |
73 |
|
|
I. INTRODUCTION |
73 |
|
|
II. IMPEDANCE PNEUMOGRAPHY |
73 |
|
|
III. HARDWARE IMPLEMENTATION |
74 |
|
|
IV. SIGNAL ACQUISITION AND VALIDATION |
75 |
|
|
V. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS |
76 |
|
|
Signal Processing Architecture for Electrical Tomography Impedance |
77 |
|
|
I. INTRODUCTION |
77 |
|
|
II. PROPOSED ARCHITECTURE |
77 |
|
|
III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
79 |
|
|
IV. CONCLUSION |
80 |
|
|
In vivo Electrical-Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) Readings in the Human Rectum |
81 |
|
|
I. INTRODUCTION |
81 |
|
|
II. MATERIALS AND METHODS |
81 |
|
|
III. RESULTS |
82 |
|
|
IV. DISCUSSION |
83 |
|
|
V. CONCLUSIONS |
83 |
|
|
Correlation between Algometry and Electrical Bioimpedance in Subjectswith and without Fibromyalgia |
85 |
|
|
I. INTRODUCTION |
85 |
|
|
II. MATERIALS AND METHODS |
85 |
|
|
III. RESULTS |
86 |
|
|
IV. DISCUSSION |
87 |
|
|
V. CONCLUSION |
87 |
|
|
Use of Bioimpedance Method to Quantify Changes in Left Ventricular Contractilityin Experiments on Anesthetized Rats |
89 |
|
|
I. INTRODUCTION |
89 |
|
|
II. METHODS |
89 |
|
|
III. RESULTS |
90 |
|
|
IV. DISCUSSION |
91 |
|
|
V. CONCLUSIONS |
92 |
|
|
Evaluation of the Heath-Carter Somatotype Revisited: New BioimpedanceEquations for Children and Adolescents |
93 |
|
|
I. INTRODUCTION |
93 |
|
|
II. SUBJECTS AND METHODS |
93 |
|
|
III. RESULTS |
94 |
|
|
IV. CONCLUSIONS |
96 |
|
|
Author Index |
97 |
|
|
Keyword Index |
98 |
|